new paint

A forum for Appearance Discussions. (Exterior, Body Kits, & Interior)
User avatar
johnmx3ze
Regular Member
Posts: 1502
Joined: October 30th, 2008, 8:07 pm
Location: hawkesbury
Contact:

new paint

Post by johnmx3ze »

ok so im getting my car painted this winter..

i cant set my mind on what i want...

so i need some of your ideas...

i like the charcoal that i have now but i want something different...

maybe like a 2 tone...?

i dont know!!!

give me ideas
mx-3, KL turbo (tooo much to list) yeah its boosted!
worklog====> http://mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=67582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
cardomain==> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3869504/1 ... awks-on-ca" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
User avatar
solo_ryder
Senior Member
Posts: 6289
Joined: October 16th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: new paint

Post by solo_ryder »

Revert back to OEM body style and paint the car the same color or white with abit of blue pearl. Or even better, silver haha

Damn I am biased. But seriously, the color you have now is nice!

Go back to OEM
User avatar
mitmaks
Senior Member
Posts: 8704
Joined: September 10th, 2001, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Spokane, WA
Contact:

Re: new paint

Post by mitmaks »

wheres pics of your car?
Magnum s/s lines, strut bars, carbon fiber bezel, indiglow gauge, Sony Xplod, inverted c/f hood, SRD lower tie bar '93 GS SE '95 Cobra SVT #2722 '68 Charger R/T 440
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks
Image
User avatar
johnmx3ze
Regular Member
Posts: 1502
Joined: October 30th, 2008, 8:07 pm
Location: hawkesbury
Contact:

Re: new paint

Post by johnmx3ze »

mitmaks wrote:wheres pics of your car?
here are the pics...

if you think of a nice color or design post a picture...

Image

Image

Image
mx-3, KL turbo (tooo much to list) yeah its boosted!
worklog====> http://mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=67582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
cardomain==> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3869504/1 ... awks-on-ca" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
User avatar
93vtecklr
Regular Member
Posts: 924
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 12:10 am
Location: Red Deer, Alberta

Re: new paint

Post by 93vtecklr »

I say go back to oem, stay with that colour, and remove all chrome. There's already a two tone battle going on somewhere else on this site, general concensus, don't do it.
Image
1993 Blaze Red SE, 17" blackie's, b+m sts, 45 deg 3" exh pipe/intake tube, K8ZE, aftmkt probe headers, magnaflow hi-cat, all 2.5" piping, magnaflow muffler.
1976 Datsun 620 p/u, full airride, Firestone 2600`s, 16ga fuel cell, Optima yellow top, AZ compressor, custom tubular frame with 9in step notch, 18" 100 spokes
1955 Willys Overland 4x4 P/U, '78 LT1 350 cu.in, fully restored.
User avatar
solo_ryder
Senior Member
Posts: 6289
Joined: October 16th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: new paint

Post by solo_ryder »

93vtecklr wrote:I say go back to oem, stay with that colour, and remove all chrome. There's already a two tone battle going on somewhere else on this site, general concensus, don't do it.
+1

Car would look dope if it was canned with a sick color like that and a good sturdy OEM style
User avatar
johnmx3ze
Regular Member
Posts: 1502
Joined: October 30th, 2008, 8:07 pm
Location: hawkesbury
Contact:

Re: new paint

Post by johnmx3ze »

i dont want any oem look im building it for carshow...

and oem stuff in a car show sucks...
mx-3, KL turbo (tooo much to list) yeah its boosted!
worklog====> http://mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=67582" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
cardomain==> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3869504/1 ... awks-on-ca" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
User avatar
Inodoro Pereyra
Senior Member
Posts: 2067
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 3:44 pm
Location: Back in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: new paint

Post by Inodoro Pereyra »

johnmx3ze wrote:i dont want any oem look im building it for carshow...

and oem stuff in a car show sucks...
I guess it depends on the car show. Personally, I agree with 93vtecklr and Solo_ryder.

As it is right now, besides the fact that the car looks like the very definition of rice, there's way too much going on to even think of a 2 tone. The car would look like a circus.
But if you removed all the clutter, you could probably get some nice graphics, and in my opinion the car would look much better. Right now, you could paint it flat black, and it'd still be loud as hell.
U28sIG5vdyB5b3UgYWxzbyBrbm93IGJhc2UgNjQuLi5odWg/DQpTSE9XIE9GRiEhIQ==

"The more I know man, the more I love my dog."

Diogenes of Sinope.
User avatar
solo_ryder
Senior Member
Posts: 6289
Joined: October 16th, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: British Columbia

Re: new paint

Post by solo_ryder »

johnmx3ze wrote:i dont want any oem look im building it for carshow...

and oem stuff in a car show sucks...
Have you considered maybe like a mazdaspeed nose with your Intercooler behind it? Some OEM sideskirts or the mazdaspeed style ones?

You would still have a kit, but it would be mellow and still look different from OEM. Plus youd have more ground clearence
User avatar
onlytrueromeo
Senior Member
Posts: 2756
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 10:05 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Re: new paint

Post by onlytrueromeo »

Does rice really win at car shows?

I would think car show winners would be cars people WANT to drive...
User avatar
Inodoro Pereyra
Senior Member
Posts: 2067
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 3:44 pm
Location: Back in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: new paint

Post by Inodoro Pereyra »

onlytrueromeo wrote:Does rice really win at car shows?
Unfortunately, when it comes to imports, in most cases the answer is yes. Car shows have become a "the more stuff you can cram in your car, the better" kinda deal, and good taste is getting to be a thing of the past.
U28sIG5vdyB5b3UgYWxzbyBrbm93IGJhc2UgNjQuLi5odWg/DQpTSE9XIE9GRiEhIQ==

"The more I know man, the more I love my dog."

Diogenes of Sinope.
User avatar
onlytrueromeo
Senior Member
Posts: 2756
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 10:05 pm
Location: Albany, NY

Re: new paint

Post by onlytrueromeo »

Damn, that sucks...
User avatar
mitmaks
Senior Member
Posts: 8704
Joined: September 10th, 2001, 2:01 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Spokane, WA
Contact:

Re: new paint

Post by mitmaks »

looks pretty good as it is
Magnum s/s lines, strut bars, carbon fiber bezel, indiglow gauge, Sony Xplod, inverted c/f hood, SRD lower tie bar '93 GS SE '95 Cobra SVT #2722 '68 Charger R/T 440
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks
Image
User avatar
93vtecklr
Regular Member
Posts: 924
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 12:10 am
Location: Red Deer, Alberta

Re: new paint

Post by 93vtecklr »

Same age old battle. To each his own, he's asking us for our opinions so let's not label him. The car is an eye catcher, but not a head turner in my HUMBLE opinion. When you put a whole bunch of things on the car, it takes away from the lines, and curves that drew us to them to begin with. The exterior of my car will never be anything but stock, as well as the interior. I love my car that way, and I will always own it that way. I'm a much larger fan of the angry eye mod over o.e. type projectors than hacked up fenders with civic projectors. Again I must stress, that these are my opinions. But I'll stress harder, lose the chrome.
Image
1993 Blaze Red SE, 17" blackie's, b+m sts, 45 deg 3" exh pipe/intake tube, K8ZE, aftmkt probe headers, magnaflow hi-cat, all 2.5" piping, magnaflow muffler.
1976 Datsun 620 p/u, full airride, Firestone 2600`s, 16ga fuel cell, Optima yellow top, AZ compressor, custom tubular frame with 9in step notch, 18" 100 spokes
1955 Willys Overland 4x4 P/U, '78 LT1 350 cu.in, fully restored.
User avatar
Inodoro Pereyra
Senior Member
Posts: 2067
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 3:44 pm
Location: Back in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: new paint

Post by Inodoro Pereyra »

onlytrueromeo wrote:Damn, that sucks...
Yeah, it does... :(
Especially with a car with so much potential.
Take a look at this thread, for example:

http://www.mx-3.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=69754

I think there's no doubt that's a highly customized MX-3. However, it's been designed with respect for the car's lines, and the result is strikingly beautiful and clean.
That car would probably win any design contest it was presented on, but at a car show, nobody would give it a second look.

Sad, really.
93vtecklr wrote:Same age old battle. To each his own, he's asking us for our opinions so let's not label him. The car is an eye catcher, but not a head turner in my HUMBLE opinion. When you put a whole bunch of things on the car, it takes away from the lines, and curves that drew us to them to begin with. The exterior of my car will never be anything but stock, as well as the interior. I love my car that way, and I will always own it that way. I'm a much larger fan of the angry eye mod over o.e. type projectors than hacked up fenders with civic projectors. Again I must stress, that these are my opinions. But I'll stress harder, lose the chrome.
The way I see it, he's asking for our opinions, and that's what he's getting... :shrug:
In my HUMBLE ( :wink: ) opinion, the car is a freak show. Sorry, I know it's harsh, but at least I'm honest...
The exterior of my (future) MX-3 will NOT be stock, and neither will be the interior, but I plan on modifying it without distorting the car's lines, and without converting it into a parts display.

Anyways, I agree, the chrome is an eyesore...
U28sIG5vdyB5b3UgYWxzbyBrbm93IGJhc2UgNjQuLi5odWg/DQpTSE9XIE9GRiEhIQ==

"The more I know man, the more I love my dog."

Diogenes of Sinope.
Post Reply

Return to “Appearance”