Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

A Forum For Ontario MX-3 Club Related Topics.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11213
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

http://www.cspnet.com/ME2/Audiences/dir ... 5D06B85495
Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario
Retailers launch class-action suit seeking $200 million for franchise violations

TORONTO -- Sunoco retailers in Ontario have launched a class-action lawsuit, seeking up to $200 million (Canadian; $194 million U.S.), against Suncor, alleging that the company has violated their franchise agreements by planning to terminate their stations, reported The Financial Times.

This lawsuit was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Jan. 28, 2010, on behalf of all Sunoco gas station operators in Ontario against Suncor Energy Products Inc. and its parent company Suncor Energy Inc., David Sterns of Toronto-based law firm Sotos LLP, which is representing the retailers, said in a statement.

The lawsuit follows on Suncor's internal announcement in January 2010 of its intention to terminate the retailer franchise agreements of all 300 of its independent Sunoco retailers in Ontario. Approximately 100 retail sites will be closed in April 2010, while the remaining sites will be rebranded under the Petro-Canada banner with different operators. All 300 current Sunoco retailers will be terminated in the process, Sotos said.

The retailers claim in the lawsuit that Suncor failed to comply with Ontario's franchise legislation when they entered into their most recent franchise agreements. This entitles the retailers to rescind their franchise agreements and obtain substantial compensation, said Sotos.

"Suncor's franchise operators have been treated as chattels in the amalgamation process. The operation of Ontario's franchise legislation will result in Sunoco's dealers, who built up the Sunoco brand through years of hard work and loyal service, receiving a return on their personal efforts and investments.," Sterns told the CNW Group in a separate report.

The termination of the Sunoco retailers is part of Suncor's decision to eliminate the Sunoco brand in Ontario following Suncor's merger with Petro-Canada in 2009, the statement said.

(Click here to view previous CSP Daily News coverage.)

Click here to view the court documents.

Suncor Energy Products Inc. markets transportation fuels and convenience products in Ontario under the brand name Sunoco. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Suncor Energy, an integrated energy company based in Calgary, Alberta. Sunoco in Canada is unrelated to Sunoco in the United States, which is operated by Sunoco Inc., Philadelphia.


http://www.canadiandriver.com/2010/01/1 ... ebrand.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Toronto, Ontario – Suncor Energy Products will sell or rebrand all 300 of its independent Sunoco retailers in Ontario, prompting an intended class action lawsuit by the service station operators. The termination is part of Suncor’s decision to eliminate the Sunoco brand in Ontario following Suncor’s amalgamation with Petro-Canada in 2009.

The lawsuit follows on Suncor’s internal announcement last week of its intention to terminate the retailer franchise agreements of its 300 retailers. Approximately 100 retail sites will be sold in April 2010, while the remaining sites will be rebranded under the Petro-Canada banner with different operators. All 300 current Sunoco retailers will be terminated in the process.

In the lawsuit, the retailers assert that Suncor failed to comply with Ontario’s franchise legislation when they entered into their most recent franchise agreements. This entitles the retailers to rescind their franchise agreements and obtain substantial compensation.

“Suncor’s franchise operators have been treated as chattels in the amalgamation process,” said David Sterns, lawyer for the plaintiffs. “The operation of Ontario’s franchise legislation will result in Sunoco’s dealers, who built up the Sunoco brand through years of hard work and loyal service, receiving a return on their personal efforts and investments.”
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
MX3-4U2NV
Regular Member
Posts: 546
Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:51 pm
antispam: No
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by MX3-4U2NV »

Knew about this for a while. I have lived across from a Sunoco for ages. Very friendly owners, told me all about this stuff last October.

Originally, all Sunoco's were going to be turned in to Petro Canada's, but still served Sunoco gas.

The nice lady who works at the one across the street from me is pretty upset, as I imagine I would be too.
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

Meh, so what? I never get fuel there anyway.
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
User avatar
MX3-4U2NV
Regular Member
Posts: 546
Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:51 pm
antispam: No
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by MX3-4U2NV »

Sunoco has performed the best for me in all my vehicles. I have had problems with Petro Canada and Esso (shitty batch of fuel)

The MX-3 especially loves the 94 octane
User avatar
JWMX3
Senior Member
Posts: 2060
Joined: March 23rd, 2004, 2:01 am
Location: Grassie, Ontario
Contact:

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by JWMX3 »

Sunoco is the only one to sell 94 octane. i use it in my Bike exclusively and sometimes in my mx3 as well.

highest octane around me is 91 without sunoco. this sucks. I might have to start going all the way to st.catherines to get esso 93 for the yamaha :evil:
Image
94' Mx3 GS 0-60 in 7.53s [5 spd conversion / Rebuilt 2.5 KL]
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

MX3-4U2NV wrote:The MX-3 especially loves the 94 octane
Clearly doesn't know about octane number ^


PS - I use Shell. They have nitrogen enriched fuel :mrgreen:
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
User avatar
MX3-4U2NV
Regular Member
Posts: 546
Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:51 pm
antispam: No
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by MX3-4U2NV »

_-Night-Shade-_ wrote:
MX3-4U2NV wrote:The MX-3 especially loves the 94 octane
Clearly doesn't know about octane number ^
I do know about octane numbers thank you. When I got the car from sitting at the persons house for a long time, I started with regular, ran a tank, next octane up, ran a tank, etc, until I got to 94. Having the hotter temps because of the higher octane really helped clean out the engine which gave me an almost flawless, perfectly clean emissions test.

I know I really don't have to worry about knock, seeing as the engine is bone stock aside from the intake, but so running 89 or 94 wouldn't really matter, seeing as we all know the higher the octane, the less likely to knock.

This should be common knowledge;

Many high-performance engines are designed to operate with a high maximum compression, and thus demand high-octane premium gasoline. A common misconception is that power output or fuel mileage can be improved by burning higher octane fuel than a particular engine was designed for. The power output of an engine depends in part on the energy density of its fuel, but similar fuels with different octane ratings have similar density. Since switching to a higher octane fuel does not add any more hydrocarbon content or oxygen, the engine cannot produce more power.

However, burning fuel with a lower octane rating than required by the engine often reduces power output and efficiency one way or another. If the engine begins to detonate (knock), that reduces power and efficiency for the reasons stated above. Many modern car engines feature a knock sensor – a small piezoelectric microphone which detects knock, and then sends a signal to the engine control unit to retard the ignition timing. Retarding the ignition timing reduces the tendency to detonate, but also reduces power output and fuel efficiency.

All-in-all, I appreciate your input, but please don't be so quick to assume. I did work in a performance shop selling 110 and 114 octane fuels as well as methanol for many supercharged and turbo'd engines.

NEVER once did I say anything about how the MX likes it, just that it does. Never thought someone would be so keen to attack and assume I "Clearly doesn't know about octane number ^"
Last edited by MX3-4U2NV on February 11th, 2010, 6:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Nd4SpdSe
Senior Member
Posts: 11213
Joined: May 25th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Contact:

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Nd4SpdSe »

Truck doesn't seem to be picky on the fuel, but I did get slightly better milleage with 94, but I haven't used that stuff in the truck for months unfortunatly.

Mx-3 never liked Shell, always got the worst milleage with it. Mx-3 never knocked with low octane, but if I use anything less than 91 it would suck that stuff back so fast...reason she only ever saw a few tanks of that stuff in her life.

There's those BPI stations I believe, they sell Sonoco there too, maybe they'll be changed to those...but they gotta keep the 94 somehow...
1992 Mazda Mx-3 GSR - 2.5L KLZE : Award Winning Show Car & Race Car ['02-'09] (Retired)
2004 Mazda RX-8 GT - Renesis Wankel : LS3 Coils, BHR Mid-Pipe + Falken RT-615K 245/40r18
2011 Mazda Mazda2 GS - 1.5L Manual : Yozora Edition (1 of 500)
2003 Nissan Xterra SE - 4x4 Supercharged : 2" Body Lift, 4" Suspension Lift & 33" MTR Kevlar
2001 Nissan Frontier SE - The Frontrailer : Expedition/Off-Road Trailer Project
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

I wasn't attacking. It's just the MX-3 doesn't "like" any specific octane. In stock form 87 will be enough for it to operate at its peak. I'm not aware of higher octanes raising combustion temperatures; in fact if there is such a theory then the higher octane would have to be the cooler one in order for it to make sense. And I definitely wouldn't attribute the emissions test to that.

Mike - not sure what the issues with yours were, I've never had problems with Shell gasoline. To be honest I really doubt that there are any major differences between different suppliers' fuels. It all comes from the same place anyway. People seem to like believing in conspiracies.
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
User avatar
Ryan
Senior Member
Posts: 7199
Joined: April 7th, 2008, 1:06 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Manitoba

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Ryan »

I wouldn't say all fuels come from the same place. There are clearly different tiers of gasoline. superstore, husky, and fasgas probably carry the same crap. Co-op, Petro-can, and esso probably carry the same crap, and I bet shell and sunoco carry the same stuff.

At least, quality wise.
Now with Moderator power!

Black '93 BP RS - wrecked, parted, scrapped.
Green GS - Sold.
Black GS - Summer DD/Race car - Fancy KLZE
Red GS - K8-ATX -> MTX-KLDE - Frakencar. Scrapped
White GS - Rusty. Parts. Scrapped
1997 BMW M3 - my summer baby
2002 BMW 325Xi - sold
2003 Forester Xti - EJ20K swapped.
Feedback
User avatar
MX3-4U2NV
Regular Member
Posts: 546
Joined: August 25th, 2009, 9:51 pm
antispam: No
Location: Mississauga, Ontario

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by MX3-4U2NV »

I would agree yes, that the origin of the fuel is the same place...oil fields... but it's how each individual company refines it that makes the difference.

For instance, we all know milk comes from cows. And some milks you can definitely taste a difference between them.

Another example of something similar; I used to move machine, large ones, in factories up until 6 months ago. One particular place, in Brampton, bottled oil for our vehicles.

Did you know that motormaster, penzoil, some quakerstate, valvoline, and one other brand I can't remember all came out of the same vat? I laughed when i first saw it. People swore by this oil, swore by that oil, when these few brands all came from the same place.

Same with my aquarium lights for my salt water aquarium. You have to have certain lights, to put out a certain spectrum, for your corals to survive. People swear by either Geismans, ATI's, or Aquascience. Fact of the matter is, they are made by ONE company, who Geisman, ATI, and Aqua Science pay to put their names on the bulbs they make. You'll go to the store, each bulb is the same, made in the same place, have different companies' names on them, but will cost a few bucks different here and there.
User avatar
Ryan
Senior Member
Posts: 7199
Joined: April 7th, 2008, 1:06 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Manitoba

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Ryan »

That exact same theory goes for all consumer eletronics. There are only 2 companies that make LCD screens, IIRC. Everyone else just puts a case on it and calls it theirs.
Now with Moderator power!

Black '93 BP RS - wrecked, parted, scrapped.
Green GS - Sold.
Black GS - Summer DD/Race car - Fancy KLZE
Red GS - K8-ATX -> MTX-KLDE - Frakencar. Scrapped
White GS - Rusty. Parts. Scrapped
1997 BMW M3 - my summer baby
2002 BMW 325Xi - sold
2003 Forester Xti - EJ20K swapped.
Feedback
Bigb22
Regular Member
Posts: 103
Joined: March 29th, 2008, 1:11 pm

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Bigb22 »

Ok I know some ppl say I'm crazy but I think on my stock 4 cyl twin cam mx 3 that sunnoco 94 octaine combined with the nos racing octane booster really performed well with my car considering that the owners Manual says to go 91 octaine or higher it felt like my car was performing with half a tank of gas in it and yes there was a full tank of gas in my car. I did on the other hand find that I used up my fuel faster then useual when I put in the nos racing ocatine boost with the nitro methane mix in it
User avatar
_-Night-Shade-_
Senior Member
Posts: 2664
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by _-Night-Shade-_ »

^ LoL. A car with half a tank of gas should perform the same as a car with a full tank? (Okay so it'll be like 20lbs lighter).
91 in the manual is the RON. Pump octane number is in (R + M)/2. So in reality the 87 at the pump is a 91 RON.
--------------------------------------------
[WORKLOG] [FOR SALE] [Wishlist] [Feedback]
Bigb22
Regular Member
Posts: 103
Joined: March 29th, 2008, 1:11 pm

Re: Sunoco Terminating All Franchise Agreements in Ontario

Post by Bigb22 »

I can feel a difference when my car runs on the 94 sunnoco fuel with the nos octaine boost with nitro methan mix included I was only saying I found a good mix I noticed my acceleration from 100 to 120 was faster
Post Reply

Return to “Ontario MX-3 Club”