Page 1 of 2
MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 28th, 2001, 10:11 am
by macnwigs
Hey,<P>I have a buddy who keeps crapping on my car (not literally)...He has a MX-6 and says the MX-3 is just a hacked up version of his. Does anyone else come across these ignorant MX-6 er's?
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 28th, 2001, 1:22 pm
by -=deathtrap-mx3=-
nah, but i always joke about them trying to make a mx6, and the machines broke halfway down the length of the car. so they just decided to slap a hatch on there.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 28th, 2001, 8:57 pm
by mazdamaniac
Well, the design for the MX-3 came a few years before the MX-6. The design team started on the MX-3 in '87 and had the design together by '89/'90.<BR>The Ford guys got together with the Mazda team for the Probe in '91 and borrowed a bunch of ideas from the MX-3.<BR>The MX-6 grew out of the Probe chassis.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 29th, 2001, 5:54 am
by -=deathtrap-mx3=-
um... it was a joke....i don't care how the dates apply to the joke....just having some fun...
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 29th, 2001, 8:53 am
by Raivynn
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by -=deathtrap-mx3=-:<BR><STRONG>um... it was a joke....i don't care how the dates apply to the joke....just having some fun...</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>He was just giving some background...<P>I didn't know the MX-6 came from the Probe. I thought it was the other way around. Cool history lesson.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: December 31st, 2001, 1:19 pm
by -=deathtrap-mx3=-
sorry, my mistake. i thought he was trying to show me up or something.... [img]shrug.gif"%20border="0[/img]
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 3rd, 2002, 1:49 am
by ssmog
I am actually in the process of fabricating all the required parts needed for the mod's i will be doing to my MX-3. I want to remove the hatch, and in its place install a "trunk lid" so to speak and a flat back glass window. Yet at the same time keeping the origional side panels where they meet the hatch, only thing I am affraid of is that it may end up looking like one of those Honda Civic delSols sewing machines. Anybody have any sugesstions?
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 3rd, 2002, 11:25 pm
by Esper
if you do that, YOU WILL HAVE A DEL SOL. not in performance, but certainly in looks. please don't.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 4th, 2002, 1:55 am
by VizualXTC
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Esper:<BR><STRONG>if you do that, YOU WILL HAVE A DEL SOL. not in performance, but certainly in looks. please don't.
</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>del Sol's are sexy as hell.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 5th, 2002, 7:21 pm
by 5spd_GS
no.. no they arent... <BR>Del Sol's are Honda's version of a freekin pop can with an engine.. its SO ugly..<P>besides, MX-3's are uniqe enuf, we all get looks driving down the street... why change something that already works?
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 6th, 2002, 12:51 am
by loudsubz
Mx-3's are girls cars. I rather drive a pop can than a girls car.
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 7th, 2002, 7:17 am
by wantamx3
Talk about girly things....you said it....Rockford Fosgate subs!!!<BR>Get something with some power!!!<P>P.S. I think Mx-3's are tight!!!
Re: MX-3 vs MX-6
Posted: January 14th, 2002, 9:53 pm
by Mx-3 Gs-x
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by loudsubz:<BR><STRONG>Mx-3's are girls cars. I rather drive a pop can than a girls car.
</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P><BR>THATS TRUE BUT ONLY IF U WERE GAY!! I WOULDNT MIND RIDING WITH GERLS IN A MX3 THEN 2 ROLL WIT ALL DICKS IN A DEL SOL BUT I GUESS IT AINT UR PARENTS FAULT NOW IS IT? SO WHAT IM SAYIN IS THIS GUY AINT PLAYING IN THE SAME GAME AS MOST OF THESE GUYS IN HERE HAHA NOW U CAN f--- OFF