Page 1 of 1
normaly asperated or turboed ?
Posted: October 1st, 2002, 4:25 pm
by bugz
ok im kinda stuck <BR> im wanting the most hp i can get outa the 2.5 .. would it be better more torque an compression or turbos with low compression ? i was thinking high compression with very very small supercharger.. an ideas would be very aprecieated
Re: normaly asperated or turboed ?
Posted: October 1st, 2002, 4:58 pm
by BigProbe
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by billy:<BR><STRONG>ok im kinda stuck <BR> im wanting the most hp i can get outa the 2.5 .. would it be better more torque an compression or turbos with low compression ? i was thinking high compression with very very small supercharger.. an ideas would be very aprecieated</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P><BR>How much would you like to spend?<P>Turbo 2.5<BR>210-250whp = $3500-5000<BR>NA 2.5<BR>210-250whp = $10-20,000.
Re: normaly asperated or turboed ?
Posted: October 1st, 2002, 5:24 pm
by bugz
basicly.<BR>.pistons,<BR>cams<BR>srings<BR>forges valves<BR>polished heads<BR>an milled<BR> ...for internal..or<BR> do the same but go low compression with a turbo ?
Re: normaly asperated or turboed ?
Posted: October 1st, 2002, 5:38 pm
by BigProbe
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by billy:<BR><STRONG>basicly.<BR>.pistons,<BR>cams<BR>srings<BR>forges valves<BR>polished heads<BR>an milled<BR> ...for internal..or<BR> do the same but go low compression with a turbo ?</STRONG><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P><BR>Don't forget Spark, Fuel, and Timing..
