MX-3.com

I know it wouldn't be direct fit or anything but it seems easier than the supra tail lights. In fact it looks pretty easy except for placing the back up lights else where which wouldnt be too hard. if anybody has any input lemme know. I'm gonna look into gettin this done, i'll let you guys know.

here's my opinion(which you may not care to hear). if you are going to put "any" money into fabricating tail-lights for your car, do something nobody else has. personally, i only like the altezzas on the car they came on...the is300. get the j-spec supra lights and get them molded...that's not a common thing...which would make it look A LOT nicer. but then again, that's must my opinion..which is what makes peoples cars unique.

hear ya go, <A HREF="http://www.megaranger.net/presso/taillamp.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.megaranger.net/presso/taillamp.htm</A>

dammit! it's in Japanese or something just as unreadable!<P>the question I have is; Why was the lens smashed to tiny bits?<P>And what was used to make the new cover?<P>It rocks, but I'm not sure what happened there.<P>RF

translate it<A HREF="http://babelfish.altavista.com/" TARGET=_blank>http://babelfish.altavista.com/</A>

Marlon has already translated it for some of us about three months ago.<BR><A HREF="http://marlonthefishkin.tripod.ca/untitled.jpg" TARGET=_blank>http://marlonthefishkin.tripod.ca/untitled.jpg</A>