If it looks any better, I'll cry:crying:
Thanks for the tip! Please do put up pics of the ram air setup. I think you, or someone should do a "how to" writeup. People don't know what a difference it could make, especially since you can't dyno it.
My Car
-
fowljesse
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 5676
- Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
- Location: portland, OR
- Contact:
Re: My Car
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
Re: My Car
Yeah i think i noticed a difference with the ram air. It just pulls in the coolest air possible too. On a cool night after getting home from a spirited drive the pipe is ice cold. I wish i had a wideband or something because i would probably gain more power if i could adjust the fuel for the cooler intake temps. Right? or am i incorrect? Ive got dyno sheets from the previous owner of 172whp at 37psi fuel pressure, in 80 degree temps. timpronk our cars must run real similiar because when i went to the track i trapped 98 with a 2.8 60 ft time, so i only ran a 15.0, it was cold that night and nobody was getting traction. Thanks for the compliment.