DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

This forum is for Discussion on Suspension issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Josh »

Well I was going to ask what folks here are running and what they thought about swapping to DOT 4 but then came across this wright up on an Acura forum and thought I would post it here.
What are the differences and what do they mean? Much perhaps a topic I never come across on Honda forums. I'm going to give you a simple idea on what each category of brake fluids mean and which is the one most suitable/applicable for our CL7/9s for road and track work. After all, selecting the correct and most appropriate brake fluid comes hand in hand with how good your brakes work under all situations and circumstances.

Polyglycol Based DOT3 - Color - Amber | One of the most common finds on the market and have a specific for cars designed for the late 80s period. Although compatible with our CL7/9s should you cannot find the required selected grade, this is not the correct specification to be used from factory recommendation guidelines. DOT3 also absorbs moisture the quickest and has the lowest boiling point and should only strictly be for road use.

Polyglycol Based DOT4 - Color - Amber | The benchmark specifications by the majority of car manufacturers, this is also the specific grade to be used with Hondas/Acura cars regardless of models. DOT4 is designed to absorb moisture slower than DOT3 and has a higher boiling point. This is both suitable for road use and track work. While the OEM Honda DOT4 brake fluid is sufficient for weekend trackdays, meets etc. Using racing specific DOT4 refined brake fluids will increase higher temperature tolerance particularly under hard braking conditions.

Silicone Based DOT5 - Color - Purple | Least common and also the most different from both grades above. DOT5 are primarily designed for cars not equipped with ABS units (Unless otherwise manufacturer specific)and this should not be used unless you're absolutely sure of what you're doing. DOT5 does not absorb moisture and holds the highest boiling point. This brake fluid is not compatible with either categories above and should never be mixed due to it's chemical properties.

Always take care when handling brake fluid as this will corrode body paint work in a matter of seconds if contact is made. Should accidental spills or drips happen, immediately flush affected surface area with high spraying water and wipe off area.

Should you choose to switch to a higher category or quality/grade brake fluid, it is strongly recommended that you perform a complete brake fluid flush. Never use a mineral or synthetic based oil ala engine oil or transmission fluid in substitute of specific designed brake fluid. Such incompatibility will cause all rubber components in the brake hydraulic system to swell up and leak.
you forgot about DOT 5.1 which can be used/mixed with DOT3 & 4.
This is from Motul's white papers comparing 5.1 to the others

The high wet boiling point (185°C / 365°F), superior to DOT 4 (155°C / 311°F mini) and DOT 3 (140°C / 284°F mini) fluids enables to use this product longer. Indeed, DOT 3 / DOT 4 and DOT 5.1 brake fluids have the property to absorb humidity contained in the air, which reduces their boiling points and consequently security.
The wet boiling point is representative of the fluid after one year of use.

Specially designed to anti-locking brake systems (ABS) :
The viscosity (820 centipoises at -40°C / -40°F) lower than DOT 4 (up to 1800 cp) and DOT 3 (up to 1500 cp) brake fluids, allows an easier fluid circulation in micro-valves of anti-locking systems.
Some of this is tailored to Honda but still applies.

I have ABS so I am going to look into using DOT 5.1. I am sure some of you have info to contribute, thoughts?

Edit: Found a great wright up -> http://www.gabma.us/docs/dot5.pdf
Jforce
Regular Member
Posts: 164
Joined: August 11th, 2010, 11:34 am
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Jforce »

I was told you cant use 5 in mx-3's, its to agressive and eats away the rubber components.

Maybe if you have stainles steel brake lines it won't be a problem.
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Josh »

Jforce wrote:I was told you cant use 5 in mx-3's, its to agressive and eats away the rubber components.

Maybe if you have stainles steel brake lines it won't be a problem.

That is what someone told me as well, until I actually looked into it. It does the opposite. Dot 5 is silicone based and it lubricates rubber, and will not eat paint and other things like Dot 3, 4, or 5.1. The catch is you should not use it with ABS systems. That is why they came out with Dot 5.1. When I finish my brake upgrade I will flush the system with 5.1 and when I finish the RS I will use Dot 5 as it does not have ABS.
User avatar
fowljesse
Supporting Member
Posts: 5676
Joined: March 17th, 2006, 2:59 pm
Location: portland, OR
Contact:

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by fowljesse »

Good to know. Thanks. I have wondered, but not enough to look into it.
'93 GS - P&P DE w/ ZE exh. cams/ pistns, KLG4 IM, 65mm TB, MSnS, Phenos, K&N RAI, UDP, Grnd wires, rear batt, filld MM, torq strt, TWM short shftr, Exedy, Lng tube hdrs 2.5" Side exhaust, H&R sprngs, Poly bushngs, strutbars, Alum. crss mmber&tiebar, 22mm swybar, solid links, Direzzas, leather int, Alpine 9805 stereo & alrm, keyless entry, 10 Boston Accoustics spkrs, Prjectrs, Blaster2, CF hood, FG hatch, Lexan
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Josh »

fowljesse wrote:Good to know. Thanks. I have wondered, but not enough to look into it.
Me either until the other day... lol
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by MrMazda92 »

My ABS is disabled, but I have yet to completely remove it...

Why is the dot5 fluid not recommended for ABS equipped vehicles? If it's more of a "wear and tear" issue for the ABS, then I couldn't care less. If it's something more serious than that, I'll need to go with the dot5.1 it sounds like.

Thank you for putting this up here, it answered a few of my questions, and gave me new ones! ;)
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
DRAG323
Regular Member
Posts: 30
Joined: November 24th, 2003, 2:01 am
Location: Gatineau

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by DRAG323 »

dot 4 is enough for a street car
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Josh »

MrMazda92 wrote:My ABS is disabled, but I have yet to completely remove it...

Why is the dot5 fluid not recommended for ABS equipped vehicles? If it's more of a "wear and tear" issue for the ABS, then I couldn't care less. If it's something more serious than that, I'll need to go with the dot5.1 it sounds like.

Thank you for putting this up here, it answered a few of my questions, and gave me new ones! ;)
Another point of confusion is that most people assume that since DOT 5.1 has a higher
number it must therefore be better. This is simply not true. DOT 5.1 was formulated for use
in ABS systems that require a less viscous fluid. From the information I was able to gather it
seems that most road racers are now relying on the latest generation of DOT 4 brake fluid,
along with regular fluid replacement, for the ultimate in hydraulic brake system performance.
So we may conclude that DOT 5.1 is not an improvement, but a modification for ABS use
From my understanding it is a safety thing with the valving in the ABS.
User avatar
MrMazda92
Supporting Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 8th, 2009, 5:35 pm
antispam: No
Location: Midwest

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by MrMazda92 »

Interesting...

I need to get my hands on a 4 non ABS V6 parts car, at some point...
Daily:
'12 Challenger R/T + STP - 3.92 w/ LSD, JG Cam, headers, SkipShift delete, Clutch Delay Valve delete, Hurst STS, RAM Clutch Adjuster, StopTech 6 Piston Brakes, Sticky Nittos, 435 WHP

Kid Hauler:
'08 Suburban LT 4WD - TVS 1900 Blower, LF SC Cam, headers, AFM delete, true 5" lift, 33x12s, 523 WHP

First Love:
'92 GS 5 spd - Straightneck KL/67mm TB, MegaSquirt/Coilpacks, 5 lugs/Speed6 brakes/FD wheels, wiretuck, coilovers, headers, AEM WB, Borla
Deleted: VAF/Power Steering/Air Conditioning/EGR/ABS/Auto Seatbelts/etc
User avatar
Ryan
Senior Member
Posts: 7198
Joined: April 7th, 2008, 1:06 pm
antispam: ~SPAM*SUX~
Location: Manitoba

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Ryan »

I highly recommend NOT using dot 5 in any vehicle that did not come OE DOT5. You can't just mix them like that, and they react differently with the metals and rubbers in the system. There is a good chance you will die if you put DOT 5 in your MX.
Now with Moderator power!

Black '93 BP RS - wrecked, parted, scrapped.
Green GS - Sold.
Black GS - Summer DD/Race car - Fancy KLZE
Red GS - K8-ATX -> MTX-KLDE - Frakencar. Scrapped
White GS - Rusty. Parts. Scrapped
1997 BMW M3 - my summer baby
2002 BMW 325Xi - sold
2003 Forester Xti - EJ20K swapped.
Feedback
User avatar
Josh
Supporting Member
Posts: 3432
Joined: April 18th, 2002, 2:01 am
Location: Washington state
Contact:

Re: DOT 3 v.s. DOT 4

Post by Josh »

Ryan wrote:I highly recommend NOT using dot 5 in any vehicle that did not come OE DOT5. You can't just mix them like that, and they react differently with the metals and rubbers in the system. There is a good chance you will die if you put DOT 5 in your MX.
That is why I linked what I did. It talks about that. You can use Dot 5, it is less abrasive and seals better than any of the others, but you cannot mix and match. One article I read said they flushed the entire system with DOT 5 then bleed the system every couple of days to ensure it was only DOT 5 in the system. It will not hurt the rubber or seals in any way.. If you mix them it can cause the fluid to gel and that is bad. This seems to be the trend for old muscle car guys as well as classic car restorers as it will not eat the paint or etch metals and is better for the entire system as a whole, as it eliminates moisture from the system unlike Dot 3, 4, and 5.1. If you have ever rebuilt your own brake parts you know that even though the system is sealed the metal parts corrode and rust.

My RS is completely empty of fluid and has been for several years now. I am installing my own SS lines all the way back, and rebuilding all the calipers. So, it is pretty much the ideal situation to swap it to DOT 5 if one were to do it.
Post Reply

Return to “Suspension/Brakes/Wheels/Tires”