MX-3.com

By the 1.5L are they talking about the RS 4 cylinder on the 95's?? that has 101 hp??

These guys fail at modding.. they took everything sexy on the mx-3 and trashed it...

Hoodzy wrote:By the 1.5L are they talking about the RS 4 cylinder on the 95's?? that has 101 hp??

These guys fail at modding.. they took everything sexy on the mx-3 and trashed it...

I doubt THEY have a clue what they're talking about. The 1.5L (B5) came only on the Autozam AZ3, never on the MX-3. The B6 is 1.6L, not 1.5.

That car was built (ruined?? ) by an aftermarket company, to showcase their products. I've been trying to find anything online about them, but nothing. I don't think I'm gonna miss them...

Is it just me or do these pictures not add up?

If you look at the third picture of the interior, the top part of the door trim is white but then on the exterior shot they look to be black, and the seats dont seem match up either

maybe its different stages of progression or theres something fishy

Ok the appearance of the car is ruined but as i can see and guess the WHOLE suspension system is rebuild.Man this car must have great handling.Maybe the best in here..Maybe

The whole thing could be photoshop for all we know.

That trunk doesn't look like a hatch.

That is not an MX-3 interior.

And the pictures don't match.

The seat belt holes in the seat are outlined in white in the interior shot, and not in the overall, they aren't even the same seats. Same with the top part of the door panel, you can see in the overall that it is black, and the interior its white.

The shape and size of the center console is off, the carpet isn't the right shape, unless they reshaped the floor pan... door panels are nothing like the stock MX either, and there is only so much you can do to a door panel.

That is not our rear suspension either. It has an upper ball joint on a member passing through the frame rail, which we sure as s--- don't have. Hondas do, though.

Plus the article was written from the mind of a 15 year old, and they did something with pigs to the engine (boared? Really?)

The trunk looks like it was possible.

I've been digging through my history, and I don't know which site I found this on to be honest... I'll keep looking, but I agree some of the pictures don't line up.

When I stumbled on this, I was looking through the MX-3s in the movies thread, and I went to this page http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make= ... clModel=on


The link to that was in one of the comments... I honestly don't remember which, but that's where I found it.

I actually rather like the headlights as well, but I'd still take OEM over them anyday. As far as aftermarket headlights go though, they do fit the MX-3 better than some things I've seen.

I like the floormats a lot though, and I just might go for it in my car too.

Better Question, Would you drive it?

Me Yes, But I"d be putting a 94' interior BACK IN IT! The new one is Too New Even for the supra style! = Fake and Gay!. YEs i just pulled that one...

the whole thing looks photo shopped to me. at least the first picture. the only pic that doesnt look like its been edited is the one of the sound system...

mikeinaus wrote:the whole thing looks photo shopped to me. at least the first picture.

Wow...! Good eye!

http://americancure.deviantart.com/art/ ... n-43799491

Too crap with this headlights..Luck of taste..

Yeah, I found another site with the picture on it while googling different cars to eyeball paint choices.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... 80&bih=854